UFC 223 is loaded with battles that were too-close-to-call and the chances certainly reflect this. However, we’re here in order to provide you with a hand — by presenting you with some of the best betting trends for this Saturday’s UFC occasion.
Felice Herrig Is 3-0 In Her Measure 3 Fights As An Underdog
Felice Herrig has existed the UFC for what seems like forever, but»Lil’ Bulldog» has just been with the firm since 2014. In those four years, Herrig hasn’t consistently capitalized on her sporting benefits but she has started to turn it on recently.
Herrig has won her last four bouts, three of which watched her close within an underdog. The biggest upset came when she defeated touted prospect Alexa Grasso. It’s not always pretty but Herrig has had an experience benefit and her wrestling has been demonstrated to be the deciding factor in her latest resurgence.
There’s not any doubt that combating Karolina Kowalkiewicz is considerably different than facing off against the likes of Justine Kish and Cortney Casey. That being said, if Herrig can manage to bring Kowalkiewicz into the mat, then she has the capability to shock fans and bookies alike.
Joe Lauzon Can Be 4-0 In His Measure 4 Fragrant Vs Fighters With Losing UFC Records
Joe Lauzon is only 33 years old, which is hard to fathom considering he’s 41 professional fights and has been fighting in the UFC for almost 12 decades. However, there is a reason a fighter such as this sticks around for so long. Lauzon wins when he needs to — and generally does this in manner that is exciting.
Lauzon has won his past four fights against competitors with a sub-.500 record in the UFC. You may be thinking — how often does Lauzon face off from this subpar competition? Well, only 3 occasions since December 2013 has»J-Lau» faced an opponent with a losing record in the UFC.
That being said, can we actually detract from Lauzon for combating very good competition? I really don’t think so. And it’s not like Chris Gruetzemacher — Lauzon’s competition at UFC 223 — is that good.

Read more: newyorknews.press

ОСТАВЬТЕ ОТВЕТ